Skip to main content

'Too soon to tell': Coronavirus could take large toll on US financial system


United States President Donald Trump on Wednesday night deviated barely from his usual playbook of relentlessly touting the power of the US economy, acknowledging during a news convention that the coronavirus should dent growth.

But when requested about the sharp selloff in US shares - that has seen the DJIA plummet greater than 2,000 factors or 7 percentage considering the start of trading this week - Trump seized the chance to deflect blame on to his Democratic competitors for the presidency who had held a televised debate Tuesday evening.

"I think the economic markets are very upset when they seem at the Democratic candidates standing on that stage making fools of out of themselves," Trump told reporters.

"And it (the stock market) really took a hit because of [the coronavirus] and I understand, it is additionally due to the fact of furnish chains and various other things," he added. "I suppose the stock market is will recover. The economic system is very strong."

Though Trump's outlook may additionally be traditionally rosy, in accordance to professionals who spoke with Al Jazeera, the dangers the outbreak gives to the US economic system - now in 12 months 11 of a document expansion - remains a long way from certain.

'Things can also calm down'
At least 2,770 people have died from the coronavirus and even though the outbreak suggests signs of slowing in China, it is accelerating in different parts of Asia, Europe and the Middle East.

On Wednesday, issues installed in the US after fitness authorities demonstrated a Northern California resident who had not travelled overseas to an affected region or had contact with someone recognized to be infected had contracted the virus.

On Thursday, Goldman Sachs strategists decreased their income increase outlook for US corporations this 12 months to zero, citing fallout from coronavirus inclusive of a severe decline in Chinese financial activity, decreased end-demand for US exports, grant chain disruptions, slowing US financial activity and heightened uncertainty.

But some forecasters are reluctant to make definitive calls on how the outbreak may want to unfold and inform the trajectory of fears that are already gripping traders and businesses.

"It is nonetheless too soon to inform because we do now not be aware of how far geographically it will spread," stated Christine McDaniel, a senior research fellow focusing on alternate at George Mason University's Mercatus Center.

"If the new actuality is that we are going to be residing with this new virus strain, then the quicker that reality sets in - and individuals and people and firms internalise, ie, as soon as societies resign to this new truth - then the fear component may also diminish," McDaniel instructed Al Jazeera, adding that "things may calm down."

Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for international health at the Council on Foreign Relations, also thinks it is premature to increase concrete estimates where coronavirus and the economic system are concerned.

But he informed Al Jazeera that the implications for the aviation, hotel, restaurant, cruise and transport industries had been undeniably bad, adding that the retail area "could also probably be any other victim" on the demand side of the economy.

That would be a huge blow because purchaser spending is the engine of the US economy, accounting for some two-thirds of growth.

"It is very clear that this is an acute ailment outbreak, [with] an have an impact on on people's consumption patterns," stated Huang, adding that citizens undertake "social-distancing measures and governments adopt quarantine-related measures".

Knock-on effects
With governments - which include in the US - responding to the outbreak by way of curtailing flights, the effect on the travel sector is likely to be vast.

Only Chinese airways are currently flying from China to the US, with fewer than 1,000 travellers arriving on American shores a day - other carriers have honestly cancelled flights.

This may want to have a knock-on impact for the whole US financial system says McDaniel, who notes that the tourism industry accounted for about 9 percent of the country's financial output in 2018, about $1.87 trillion of gross home product. That interprets into almost eight million jobs and eleven percent of exports.

"People are no longer going to favor to journey with this new fear, at least until a vaccine is found," stated McDaniel. "For each and every one dollar spent without delay on tourism and travel, another seventy two cents is [indirectly] generated from that dollar."

On the supply side, some professionals are worried that the high level of absenteeism at plants in China could threaten US producers who matter on Chinese-made components, in particular the automotive, electronics and pharmaceutical sectors.

"Many pharmaceuticals so heavily count upon lively pharmaceutical ingredients from China and India," Huang said. "If factories are shut down previous April, it ought to have a big have an effect on on the international drug supply."

'This will be contained'
As fears mount that US groups will face losses stemming from the outbreak, investors have been fleeing shares for safe havens like gold and bonds.

But some analysts caution against using inventory expenses as a proxy for the monetary impact of coronavirus.

"The inventory market is overreacting, like they constantly do," stated Robert Scott, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute.

"But there's no query it can have a actual poor affect on the economy," he advised Al Jazeera. "It could sincerely curtail trade between the US and China in the quick term, over the next month or two - in particular disruptive in manufacturing," he delivered noting how dependent US producers are on parts sourced from China.

That interdepenency, stated Scott, bolsters arguments towards globalisation, which Democrats and Republicans have criticised for adverse US manufacturing and costing US jobs.

"This illustrates to me one of the real prices of growing globalisation, this reliance on extended worldwide grant chains," stated Scott. "If more of these elements had been produced in the US, we might be less susceptible to this type of disruption."

Comments